Archive for the ‘Equalities Month’ Category

Yobs, mosquitos and pink lights

Friday, March 26th, 2010

In Britain we don’t really like children and teenagers. Just think about it – children and teenagers get a bad press. The media love to call them ‘yobs’, ‘thugs’ and ‘feral’. It wouldn’t be acceptable for mosquitos (a device that emits a high-pitched piercing sound that can’t be heard beyond the age of 25) to be used against any other section of the population to keep them away from a public place. The latest invention is a pink light that shows up acne to embarrass teenagers into vacating public areas. In short, children and teenagers are, more often than not, treated as a nuisance by society, or portrayed as something to be scared of. Yet when we think about equality we usually forget to talk about how young people are treated.

I recently told a friend that I was running a consultation event to gather young people’s opinions on things that affect them. He laughed and said “do they just grunt?”. I retorted a little defensively “If they did just grunt I would be doing a very bad job at facilitation”. The reality is so different to his perception. The young people I’m in contact with through my work have really good, practical ideas. They’re straight to the point, quick-thinking and solution-focused. They’re creative and they remind you about important, obvious things that adults have forgotten. They’re not interested in things being slick, instead they want to know whether you really care. And they’re willing to work with you even when things aren’t perfect. Most of all they bring enthusiasm, humour and energy.

The group of young people I’m talking about don’t come from easy backgrounds. They’ve got a dad in prison, or a mum they’ve been taken away from, or a dad who is heroin addict, or a family who have lived with domestic violence. And yet they show incredible resilience. We have to listen to children and teenagers and respect them, not only because they’re the future but because they are the here and now, because they’re equal citizens even though they can’t vote, and because they have so much to contribute, if only we would let them.

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

GUEST POST: Alastair Campbell on mental health

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010

Alastair Campbell is the former Communications Director at No 10. Here he writes about his mental health problems and his decision to speak openly about them.

When I started working as Tony Blair’s press secretary, I knew that the ‘skeletons’ would probably come out, so I never hid the fact I’d had a nervous breakdown. I’d always been very open about it, calling it my ‘mad period’. There’s no point pretending I wasn’t mad, because I was, probably for some time up to my breakdown, and then it took quite a while to recover. I think people are disarmed when you’re up front about it.

It happened in 1986 when I was 29. I was doing a piece on Neil Kinnock in Scotland, and ended up being arrested for my own safety. After a spell in hospital, I slowly rebuilt myself with help from family and friends, and a wonderful GP. Although I might have a few grounds for complaint about the way the media have reported on me on a few occasions, I feel in relation to mental illness, I have had a pretty fair deal from them. Not everyone can say that of course. The constant linking between mental illness and violence in the media is a problem .. the mentally ill are far more likely to be victims than perpetrators of violence.

I do understand people’s reservations about being open. People worry their job or their prospects might be badly affected. And it would take quite a brave politician to stand up at election time and say oh by the way, I sometimes hear voices, or I tend to get addicted to things, or I may sometimes go missing with depression. But I do think it would help if people in positions of leadership and authority were more open. When I first got involved with the Time to Change campaign, we did a report called ‘A World Without’ in which we focussed on great historical figures who had what today would be defined as mental illnesses. Churchill with his black dog. Abraham Lincoln was routinely described as melancholic. Marie Curie. Charles Darwin. Florence Nightingale. Imagine if any of those people had not been able to do the work they did. But even today people with mental health problems will tell you that sometimes the stigma and the discrimination it leads to are worse than the symptoms.

One of the reasons I’ve wanted to be open about it is that I know from my own recovery that it is possible to take strength and hope from the experience of others who’ve gone to what feels like hell and back and lived to tell the tale. I have written a novel, All In The Mind, based in part on my experiences of depression and psychosis, and have also done a documentary, Cracking Up, which can be seen on my website and I have been really pleased with the response to both. Barely a day has passed since when someone has not come up to me and said that something that happened to me, or one of the characters in the book, was something they could relate to directly because of their own experience, or that of a relative or friend. If it is true that One in Four will directly suffer a mental health problem, that means we all know someone who will, even if we don’t ourselves. If anything I think One in Four is an underestimate.

I think attitudes are changing slowly and I hope I have been able to help in that. I am very glad that the Young Fabians have decided to take up this topic. I know that a lot of young people are struggling with mental health issues, and although my advice to them would be to be open and honest, the truth is stigma and discrimination still exist, and openness might be the thing that leads to someone being rejected. But I still feel it is the best approach. We need to get to a situation where people can feel as open about saying they have mental health issues as they are about saying they have cancer or a broken leg. We are a long way off that, but I am confident that one day we will get there. It is in many ways the last great taboo. But racism, sexism, homophobia have all been challenged and to a great extent eroded because of people taking up the issues and campaigning on them.

We can do the same for the stigma and taboo surrounding mental illness, and I wish Good Luck to the Young Fabians in their role in that great cause.

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Harassment of disabled people is a scourge on society and a key challenge

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010


I was recently at a social care event when I was reminded of the horrific murder of Steve Hoskin, a Cornish man with learning disabilities. Having dealt with loneliness and isolation he befriended a couple who tormented him, eventually forcing him to take his own life by jumping off a bridge. A few weeks later I read that a man in Manchester , David Askew, also with learning disabilties had died of a heart attack after confronting people who were harassing him on his doorstep. He had suffered 17 years of abuse. This was also on the back of the case of Fiona Pilkington which gained significant public attention in 2007, as she took her own life and that of her learning disabled daughter after sustaining years of torment.

It was on the back of the Pilkington case that the Equality and Human Rights Commission initiated an inquiry into the safety and security of disabled people. In their research so far, they have concluded that the basic human rights of being able to live free from persecution and torture is denied to many disabled people. This is something that most people would find shocking and equate with oppressive regimes in distant lands as opposed to British Society – but in many cases, for people with mental health problems and learning disablilities in particular, it is an everyday truth.

In defining the key challenges we face to make a more equal society, surely this is a key one. In each of these tragic cases there must have been public servants, local officials and communities who knew of the harassment of these people and thus were in some way complicit in it. As a society we must all take responsibility, not only for turning a blind eye but also, in the case of Steve Hoskin, and certainly many others, being complicit in the isolation which lead him to seek solace in people who intended to manipulate this vulnerability.

What is clear is that a society we still regard disabled people as being intrinsically vulnerable – however these deaths illustrate that their vulnerability is not inherent. It is a function of a society that permits people to prey on those who are the weakest. In the fight for gender equality and against racism there must also be a battle cry for equal dignity and respect for disabled people.

The response to disability hate crime cannot be a return to protectionism, segregation and paternalism however. Instead, we must examine ourselves, our prejudices and behaviours whilst ensuring that disabled people are able to make their own choices and control their lives. And where there are dangers to disabled people and their freedom restricted the Police, Housing and other services must act swiftly to both diagnose and respond to disability hate crime. It is good news that this week the Crown Prosecution Service pledged to identify and prosecute such crimes.

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

GUEST POST: Fighting the stigma

Sunday, March 21st, 2010

Matt Murray is a Young Fabian member. In this guest post, he writes about the difficulties encountered by people with mental health problems.

The Labour government has elevated equalities from merely a peripheral issue and as Young Fabians we have been leading the call for a progressive social agenda. Removing inequalities goes beyond policy decisions and includes a societal dimension of tackling stigma and discrimination whilst also encouraging aspiration and well-being. It is especially important that we fully recognise the impact on mental health that the economic recession has caused on young people and their prospects.

Lack of societal understanding of the variety of conditions and the impact on sufferers’ lives has led to an attitude that ‘unseen’ mental illness is less important than ‘seen’ physical disabilities. The government’s report on Mental Health and Social Exclusion, published in 2004, identified stigma and discrimination experienced by people with mental health problems as the biggest barrier to social inclusion and 55% identified stigma as a barrier to employment. It is therefore of no surprise that those with mental health conditions may not feel comfortable with being honest about their conditions when applying for jobs for fear that disclosure may harm their application. If applicants choose not to disclose their mental health conditions then they will ultimately suffer from a dangerous lack of support in the workplace, if such support exists.

Evidence shows that more than one quarter of the population still think that people who have mental health conditions should not have the same rights to a job as anyone else and fewer than four in ten employers have said that they would recruit someone who had a mental health condition. Despite these misconceptions many people with mental health conditions are successful in their jobs and people must be allowed to reach their full potential.

The economic recession has provided a backdrop of greater difficulties for young people with mental health conditions. Increased levels of unemployment amongst young people, who already experience the highest levels of developing mental health conditions, have exacerbated the stress and worry for young people facing bigger competition for jobs. Many businesses are also not pro-active in advertising support for positive mental health in the workplace to potential applicants, even where such support exists.

Poor standards of practice in the workplace regarding mental health does not only affect sufferers but Dame Carol Black’s review of the health of Britain’s working age population estimated that the economy loses over £100 billion a year through ill-health and associated sickness absence and unemployment. Mental health accounts for between £30 and £40 billion of this. Government aims for reducing incapacity benefit claims are unlikely to succeed in the recession and a renewed focus on getting people into work is needed.

The government are recognising the importance of mental health in the Equality Bill. On 7 December 2009 a cross government approach was launched on mental health and employment titled: ‘Working our way to better mental health: a framework for action’. The report provides strong commitments to further increase mental health provisions but there appears to be a lack of focus on young people with mental health and the associated problems that exist in finding and holding onto employment.

  • Come along to the Young Fabians Equalities Month event titled “Mental Health and Equalities: What more can the Government do for young people?” on 23 March, 6.30pm Committee Room 19, House of Commons. Speakers are: Lynne Jones MP (Chair of APPG on Mental Health) and Dr Rachel Perkins (South West London and St Georges Mental Health Trust), Victoria Walsh (Rethink) and Janet Davies (Time to Change).
  • Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

    GUEST POST: Why we need YF Women

    Friday, March 19th, 2010

    Debbie Moss is a Young Fabian Member. Here she shares her reflections on the launch of YF Women.

    Last night I attended the launch of Young Fabian Women, a new initiative to support young women with an interest in progressive politics to engage in policy debates and stand for election.

    Many women of my generation may question the need for such a project. Our political consciousness has developed in the context of female cabinet ministers, all-women shortlists and equal pay legislation. We are confident of our right to a career as well as a family, and to aim as high as our male peers. Speaking at the launch, Patricia Hewitt reminded us how far we had come, thanks to the organising drive of the sixties sisterhood, but also how far we have to go. Women of my age have rights and opportunities, many guaranteed by laws passed by Labour governments.

    But we must not be complacent. Lack of representation remains the most visible challenge. Fawcett Society research shows that at the current rate of change it would take around 20 years for 50% of Labour MPs to be women. It would take the Tories a terrifying 400 years.

    Making our voices heard matters beyond Parliament. Earlier this week I was talking to a group of sixth form girls, who told me they took part in a debating society with the boys’ school next door. Their distinguished-looking male teacher shrugged and said “hardly any girls turn up, and when they do, they let the boys do all the talking”.

    But can we really let the boys do all the talking? After all, female policy makers have been instrumental in making sure healthcare, childcare and care for the elderly take centre-stage in our political discourse. Even Cameron’s Conservatives (when “on message”) pledge their allegiance to the NHS and acknowledge the necessity of a national care service. These are not “women’s issues”, they are social justice issues. But it is equally important that women contribute to debates on foreign policy, constitutional reform and the economy.

    We cannot know whether equal representation in Parliament and in the boardroom would have prevented the banking crisis or the expenses furore, but women are equally affected by the repercussions of both. So I hope that Young Fabian Women will encourage us to share ideas and support each other in the next phase of the battle for equal representation.

  • You can listen to a podcast of the speeches at the launch of YF Women at our podcast page.
  • Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

    GUEST POST: It’s up to young people to make Labour more representative

    Thursday, March 18th, 2010

    Christine Quigley is a Young Fabian member. She is Chair of London Young Labour and sits on the Compass Youth Organising Committee. In this guest post, she argues that Labour needs to work harder to properly reflect the people it represents.

    Being young and interested in politics often puts you at a disadvantage. Older party members can sometimes totally fail to take you seriously, thinking that since you didn’t live through the dark days 1980s opposition, that you couldn’t possibly have an opinion worth holding. Your apolitical friends are likely to regard your political activities as a slightly suspect and murky habit. It’s difficult for many young people to walk into their first CLP meetings, often knowing nobody and out of the loop on internal politics. It’s one of the reasons for the existence of organisations like the Young Fabians and Young Labour, which provide a space where young activists can meet other like-minded people and receive support to develop their political activities.

    What we don’t think about enough is the question of intersectionality, or multiple disadvantage. It’s hard enough to get involved in politics sometimes as a young, white, middle-class man – what about people who are young and black? Or young and a woman? Or young and with a disability?

    Within the youth movement, we’ve been working hard to make our activities more inclusive. From the end of this year, the London Young Labour executive will be 50% female, after voting to introduce quotas at last year’s AGM. Our Liberation Evening last month brought together the women’s, LGBT, black and minority ethnic and disabilities caucuses together to discuss how we reach out to young people in these groups, who remain underrepresented in political organisations, as in many facets of public life. And we’re trying to make sure that the events and activities we run are as inclusive as possible; holding more social events in venues other than pubs makes it easier for Muslim colleagues (and under-18s) to get involved, while following guidance on venue accessibility allows young people with disabilities to come along to events they might otherwise be prevented from participating in.

    But it’s not enough to try to encourage young people from minority groups already inside the Labour movement to get more involved. We need to be reaching out to the huge numbers of young people who mobilise, organise and campaign on issues without ever considering themselves party political. Taking our activities out of Westminster and into local youth groups, schools and universities and community organisations is the only way that we can encourage more people from different backgrounds into the Labour Party. Compass Youth’s recent Creative Campaigns Camp in East London is a case in point – it brought together young people of all backgrounds to talk about youth unemployment, engaging people who with direct experience of unemployment as well as those campaigining to end it.

    Let’s face it – the current Labour front bench doesn’t look like the rest of the country. It’s up to us as younger people to ensure that it becomes more reflective of the diverse, vibrant, multicultural society that is Britain. Our party needs representatives who are women, who are working-class, who are BME and LGBT and disabled, because we need people in power with direct experience of disadvantage fighting for our rights.

    Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

    GUEST POST: Three cheers for YF Women

    Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

    Rt Hon Patricia Hewitt is the MP for Leicester West and the former Secretary of State for Health. Here she writes about the launch of YF Women.

    Last week I was in the Commons to hear Harriet Harman open the (now traditional) International Women’s Debate. She made the point that when our generation started campaigning for women’s rights in the 1970s, we were regarded as some kind of fringe group of politically correct lefties. Today, all those issues we campaigned on – equal pay and sex discrimination laws, paid maternity leave, childcare and flexible working, domestic and sexual violence – are part of the mainstream political agenda. And a new survey commissioned by the Equalities Unit shows that the majority of people want an end to all-male decision-making.

    But the battle isn’t over. With 95 women MPs, Labour is far ahead of the other parties. We have changed the face of Parliament – and we have changed the agenda. Ann Cryer, for instance, bravely confronted the problem of ‘honour’ killings – something her male Tory predecessor probably never even knew about. But we are still a small minority of the Commons and a long way from a Parliament where every part of the community can see themselves represented.

    My daughter’s generation would be horrified if anyone suggested that a married woman’s income should be taxed as if it belonged to her husband. But that’s what used to happen – and it only changed because women made it change. So three cheers for the launch of YF Women. You are in the long line of women’s struggles, from Mary Wollstonecraft onwards … and your daughters and grand-daughters will thank you for it.

  • Note: Come and celebrate the launch of YF Women with a drinks reception this Thursday, 18th March from 7 p.m. in the Atlee Suite in Portcullis House. Click here for more information.
  • Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

    Equalities – trouble at the top?

    Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

    Today’s press has been bad for Trevor Phillips.

    He’s had a select committee calling him names in the playground and now the school bullies have been quick to run over and have a go too.

    But the problems Mr Phillips is accused of causing at the Equality and Human Rights Commission are not helpful for a Labour Government which is placing equality at the top of the political agenda.

    Harriet Harman is the first ever Secretary of State for Equality and her little empire of Government Equalities Office is pushing forward new thinking across Government on issues such as rape, LGBT rights, women in the labour market, and the Government’ flagship legislation – the Equalities Bill.

    Is Trevor Phillips negative press now damaging the profile of equality as an important political issue, and is the debate around equality really helped by the constant focus on one man?

    As part of our Equalities Month events, the Young Fabians are meeting tonight to discuss – What next for equalities?

    We’ll be joined by Harriet Harman’s PPS Nia Griffith MP, and Tulip Siddiq from Young Labour.

    Click here for more event details.

    Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

    Even after the “change” election, Parliament will remain unrepresentative

    Thursday, March 11th, 2010

    YF-Equalities-Month-banner

    Though much has been made of the lack of female MPs – which, despite being significantly higher now (126) than when Labour took office (60) is still 200 short of 50 per cent of the Commons – the lack of ethnic minority MPs and candidates has often been overlooked.

    There are currently only 15 ethnic minority MPs, 13 Labour and two Conservative; 13 male and only two female; no female Asian MPs; and no Liberal Democrat non-white MPs.

    Breakdown-of-MPs-by-gender-and-race

    That number is expected to rise following the election, albeit slightly. After polling day, a report on Tuesday’s Daily Politics revealed, there could be double the current figure.

    If the result is the same as in 2005, the DP calculated there would be 30 ethnic minority MPs – 21 Labour, eight Conservative and one Respect.

    However, if there was a 6.9 per cent swing to the Conservatives – the swing required for a bare majority – there would be 23 ethnic minority MPs, 13 Labour, nine Tory, one Respect and once again no Lib Dems.

    Watch the clip on YouTube:


    So keep an eye out for the likes of Rushanara Ali, PPC for Bethnal Green and Bow, and Streatham candidate Chuka Umunna, two of Insight PA’s “Parliamentary Candidates to Watch”, two of a slightly-less-small number of non-white MPs, and in the case of Rushanara, potentially Britain’s first female Asian MP.

    Sources:

    Social background of MPs, House of Commons Library, November 2005

    Ethnic Minorities in Politics, Government and Public Life, House of Commons Library, November 2008

    Frequently Asked Questions: MPs, House of Commons, February 2010

    Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

    GUEST POST: Equality-proofing public policy in Labour’s fourth term

    Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

    Neil Coyle is a Young Fabian member and works for Disabilty Alliance. He writes in a personal capacity.

    13 years into Labour Government ‘equality’ is still seen as a peripheral issue by policy-makers at national and local level – an addendum for certain sections of society rather than a mainstream concern. This ‘bolt-on’ attitude is disturbing to analysts who acknowledge that mainstreaming is the solution to delivering genuinely inclusive policies. Policy done right means all citizens can contribute, but – got wrong – means inequality is heightened and barriers to participation erected.

    Labour has attempted to ensure better analysis of the potential impact of proposals by introducing measures including ‘Equality Impact Assessments’ (EIAs). EIAs are published alongside consultations/legislative plans and are supposed to highlight risks/benefits of initiatives and how they affect disadvantaged groups.
    But the experience of EIAs in practice is variable – even in areas wholly relevant to disadvantaged groups. The Department of Health recently consulted on introducing free personal care. Older people, disabled people and carers (who are mostly women, making gender equality integral) are all relevant to the proposals.

    However, the associated EIA suggested consultation respondents should highlight relevant equality issues. This was hardly the upfront analysis intended by EIAs of the needs of the groups this reform could affect. Nor does this approach safely estimate the risks of the intended approach. Dangers include councils tightening access to services they are obliged to provide free – or cutting support to people with lower needs (forcing carers to provide more support, work less and experience greater poverty and fewer opportunities).

    Coupled with poor EIA implementation – perhaps causal to it – is little enforcement of how EIAs are undertaken or analysis of implementation outcomes – i.e. whether EIA predictions were correct. Fully centralising equality to policy development requires far greater emphasis on EIAs upfront, as well as monitoring and inspection of outcomes (lead by the Equality and Human Rights Commission) to ensure disadvantaged groups fully benefit from Labour’s fourth term.

    Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon


    Twitter links powered by Tweet This v1.7.3, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.