GUEST POST: Equality-proofing public policy in Labour’s fourth term
Neil Coyle is a Young Fabian member and works for Disabilty Alliance. He writes in a personal capacity.
13 years into Labour Government ‘equality’ is still seen as a peripheral issue by policy-makers at national and local level – an addendum for certain sections of society rather than a mainstream concern. This ‘bolt-on’ attitude is disturbing to analysts who acknowledge that mainstreaming is the solution to delivering genuinely inclusive policies. Policy done right means all citizens can contribute, but – got wrong – means inequality is heightened and barriers to participation erected.
Labour has attempted to ensure better analysis of the potential impact of proposals by introducing measures including ‘Equality Impact Assessments’ (EIAs). EIAs are published alongside consultations/legislative plans and are supposed to highlight risks/benefits of initiatives and how they affect disadvantaged groups.
But the experience of EIAs in practice is variable – even in areas wholly relevant to disadvantaged groups. The Department of Health recently consulted on introducing free personal care. Older people, disabled people and carers (who are mostly women, making gender equality integral) are all relevant to the proposals.
However, the associated EIA suggested consultation respondents should highlight relevant equality issues. This was hardly the upfront analysis intended by EIAs of the needs of the groups this reform could affect. Nor does this approach safely estimate the risks of the intended approach. Dangers include councils tightening access to services they are obliged to provide free – or cutting support to people with lower needs (forcing carers to provide more support, work less and experience greater poverty and fewer opportunities).
Coupled with poor EIA implementation – perhaps causal to it – is little enforcement of how EIAs are undertaken or analysis of implementation outcomes – i.e. whether EIA predictions were correct. Fully centralising equality to policy development requires far greater emphasis on EIAs upfront, as well as monitoring and inspection of outcomes (lead by the Equality and Human Rights Commission) to ensure disadvantaged groups fully benefit from Labour’s fourth term.
/>



