Archive for March 3rd, 2010

Fab 5: Wednesday 3 March 2010

Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010

Your Fab 5 for today:

  • Michael Foot, former Labour leader, has died. Alastair Campbell penned a poignant tribute. The Guardian have published an obituary on their website, as well as a gallery of Foot’s life in pictures.
  • Elsewhere, Jonathan Freedland thinks the BBC are caving in to pressure from Rupert Murdoch, albeit indirectly via Tory media policy
  • Andy Cooke writes for Political Betting on the problems with uniform national swing.
  • Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

    Michael Foot: A reminder of Labour’s idealism

    Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010

    Throughout the day the blogs and Twitter feeds have been inundated with tributes to Michael Foot, the former Labour leader who died today. I found Alistair Campbell’s post particularly poignant. A reminder that despite all the internal battles that Labour has faced, Foot remained committed to the Party’s mission. Foot famously said of Blair in 1995, “No rising hope on the political scene who offered his service to Labour when I happened to be leader can be dismissed as an opportunist.” To quote a tweet posted today, Foot “gave more than we deserved, and got much less than he deserved.”

    The Labour Party has come a long way since Foot’s leadership and the dark depths of Thatcher and 1983. I may have disagreed with Foot on policy. But I stand firmly in his camp when it comes to the purpose of politics. Tories may reduce politics to cynicism and pragmatism. For Labour it must always be about ideology, values and mission. Even in our darkest days we never gave up on that. As Gordon Brown said of Foot today, “[he] was a man of deep principle and great idealism.” That is what we all aspire to in the Labour movement.

    So what can we learn from Michael Foot? In many ways British politics has changed irrevocably since his day. The stark left/ right divide that characterised the 1980s has been replaced by a cross-party scramble for the centre ground. But when you scratch beneath the surface the differences between left and right remain clear to see. Today is not the day for electioneering. However, Foot’s death serves as a pertinent reminder of what we’re fighting for at the next election.

    A rich Labour tradition.

    Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

    The fight is not over: 50 years of fighting for equality and still more to do

    Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010

    It is fitting that in the year the Young Fabians celebrates its 50th anniversary, that we hold our first ever ‘Equalities Month’. Issues of equality have been of prime concern to Fabians, young and ‘older’, throughout the society’s history; as seen in the Fabian Equality Project and reflected in the 2010 Young Fabian members survey, where equalities policy was amongst the top five interests of today’s young thinkers on the left.

    Numerous legislative changes and cultural shifts, have taken place in the last 50 years which have moved towards (though not realised) an equalisation of experiences of life in Britain. I want to look all the way back though to two events in 1960 – the year the Young Fabians were founded – with impact both sides of the Atlantic, and indeed around the world.

    1960 brought the death of tireless activist, Sylvia Pankhurst. The Pankhurst family (Fabianism was part of their DNA too, you know), as leaders of the women’s suffrage movement, had international reach and their determination and work is felt today, and will be forever. Whilst women are free to participate in the electoral process, we still see a deficit in involvement in political, business and civic leadership. In crude numbers, we’re talking 32% of board seats on public bodies occupied by women, just 12% on FTSE 100 boards, and 20% of seats in the Commons and Lords. (The only parliamentary figure vaguely representative is the 47% of the Welsh Assembly that are female.) Whilst these figures must change, we shouldn’t dismiss improvement – which has happened, and is happening, as a result of action by the Labour Party and this Labour Government.

    Fifty years ago, Harper Lee’s novel To Kill a Mockingbird was first published. Ahead of civil rights legislation in the United States, the story took as its main theme racial inequality and injustice. It has been a focus of classroom study from the early 60s to the present day and in 2006 Britain’s librarians named it as the one book everyone should read. For me, Lee’s skill in using a child narrator – rather than her lawyer father, Atticus Finch – exposes the simple views and flawed arguments of prejudiced individuals and an unequal society. Despite the election, to increasingly significant positions, of BNP politicians in the last couple of years, Britain has moved on, not least due to the work of the Equalities and Human Rights Commission and its predecessor. But we as Young Fabians should take responsibility for preventing BNP ideas further permeating our society.

    So, March 2010 is marked by the Young Fabians as Equalities Month. It is likely to be the last full month of this parliament. A month that will see the launch of Young Fabian Women, a new section of the society aimed at encouraging young women to become active in politics. And royal assent should be given to a single Equality Act.

    We know these issues are important to Young Fabians, the wider labour movement, and Britain as a whole. And we shouldn’t forget – as we approach the general election – the threat that the right poses to the causes fought so passionately and adeptly by the Pankhurst family, Harper Lee, and millions of other campaigners for equality ever since.

    Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

    Fab 5: Tuesday 2 March 2010

    Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010

    Here are your Fab 5 for today:

  • Lord Ashcroft dominates the headlines. Bagehot explains why the Ashcroft affair matters – Cameron. Sunder Katwala at Next Left is a little more direct in his criticism of the Tory party leader.
  • Nick Robinson, BBC Political Editor, gets excited about the more detailed agreement for the leadership debates.
  • Will Straw of Left Foot Forward blogs about a poll which suggests the public prefer protecting front-line services over “age of austerity” cuts.
  • And Freethinkingeconomist gets increasingly irritated with proponents of a “Robin Hood Tax” on financial transactions.
  • Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon


    Twitter links powered by Tweet This v1.6.1, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.